Super Managers
Studies have shown that more than half of all large projects fail to deliver desired results. Of those that are successful, I have found that they tend to be led by super managers. In fact, the poorer the company's systems and processes are, the more talented and experienced its project team needs to be to make up for the gaps. And although hiring a highly experienced project manager does not guarantee success, it is the only chance a company with weak systems and variable processes has to succeed with its projects. Unfortunately, relying on super managers also leads to high salaries, high turnover, and increased burnout for the manager and project team members.
Through the application of lean, project success will depend less on a super manager and more on the strength of the company's processes, systems, and standards, and the ability to improve them when problems arise.
It's important to note, however, that with our without lean, the knowledge and skills of the project manager is critical to the project's success. Lean thinking can make the job of the project manager easier, though, by enabling him or her to focus less on detailed work and more on high-level objectives and team member development. Rather than continually relying on super managers, lean creates super teams through standardized processes, effective kaizen, and a focus on developing the abilities of team members.
Getting Started
Some of the basic steps to begin the process of applying lean thinking to large projects include:
Know the Objectives I am continually amazed at how often project objectives aren't absolutely clear to everyone on the team. Having a clear understanding of who the customers are and what they want can go a long way toward assuring the success of a project. Translating the objectives into safety, quality, schedule, and cost targets will also enable people to connect individual work to project success. Without continually highlighting all four of these dimensions, people can become so focused on the schedule that they ignore the others - and it is often the safety, quality, and cost issues that lead to schedule problems.
Measure Progress Creating dashboards that are highly visible to the team helps everyone know how the project is progressing and where the problems lie. Emailing an electronic project schedule, reports with a large amount of text, or S-curves does not tend to be as effective as dashboards with leading and lagging indicators of the four dimensions listed above. Besides the fact that people do not generally open email and read reports (especially when overloaded with work because of poor processes), a visual chart that is in front of people everyday - especially where meetings are held - enables everyone to see hotspots that can or may interfere with success.
Focused Meeting Rhythm One of the most critical, but often ignored elements of lean is a meeting rhythm focused on quick identification and correction of problems. A project team needs to meet regularly to identify hotspots that are - or have the potential of - interfering with progress. The rhythm should be set at a pace where problems can be seen quickly enough to act before success is jeopardized. Selecting the rhythm is one area where traditional thinking needs to be challenged. Although the work associated with large projects tends to progress at a fairly slow pace, the team should look at whether breaking the reporting into smaller pieces will increase sensitivity and reduce response time to problems.
It also helps if the meetings are held in an obeya, or war room, where the dashboards are located, so the discussion can relate directly to the information on the dashboards.
Another important aspect of meetings is that they be focused only on hotspots needing the team's attention. Too often, time is wasted in meetings communicating general information or things that have been completed on-time. This information can be posted on dashboards and read by those who are interested. The meeting discussion should be limited to problem-solving and discussion of critical elements. This can be done by focusing the agenda on the gaps between the work that should have happened since the last meeting versus what actually happened.
Swarm Problems Although meeting rhythm should be focused on highlighting hotspots, nobody should wait until a meeting to identify or act on a problem. The team needs to establish a way to pull the andon when a problem occurs so people can swarm the issue and develop countermeasures quickly that will get the project back on track.
The true benefits from lean will become evident when the mindset of the team changes and people begin to approach work differently. And counter to what many would like to believe, appealing to common sense will not drive the change in behavior needed for success. Change will not happen until without a significant amount of teaching, coaching, and close involvement with the team to demonstrate how lean will improve the project, and practice where team members apply the process. As with any change initiative, consistency, determination, and a willingness to learn by everyone - including the person driving lean - are the keys to success.
4 comments:
Using data-capture forms and, increasingly, hand-held and field-based devices, accurate time-spent data can be more easily compiled and fed into the overall project plan automatically.
project contract management
If you have project management software in place and it provides all of the above, and possibly more, in an easy to use and timely fashion, then no further action is necessary. If there are any gaps or items on the list without a tick, then you are probably working with software that is not as efficient as you need it to be.
project contract management
Matthew, thanks for the comments. Applying lean thinking to large projects does not mean taking away project mgt software. However sophisticated a PM software package is, though, it does not:
1. assure the team understands who the customers are and assuring that their needs are understood and met;
2. replace the conversations and meeting rhythm that need to happen to keep everyone on the same page and focused on meeting project objectives (e.g., safety, quality, schedule, cost);
3. assure that progress - and especially hotspots - are visually highlighted and communicated;
4. communicate progress to those outside of the team in a clear and concise manner;
5. assure input and understanding by those closest to the work;
6. drive action on hotspots and assure continual improvement of processes for the next project.
Kylie,
While I agree that the best mentors can think beyond their own experience, I'm not sure how PM certification makes this happen. I have yet to see a certification scheme that truly proves a person's abilities. While I have worked with some highly talented PMPs, I have also worked with some who I consider ineffective.
The best mentors are those who know how to relate to people and understand the way they learn.
Thanks for the comment.
Post a Comment